This page displays the Top 20 Best Male Attackers from the Paris 2024 Olympic Games. The dataset compares players using rank, team, points, errors, attempts, average points per match, success percentage, and total attacks.
Click on a player's 'Rank' column to generate a summary of the player's statistics!
Click on the column headers to better define each category! (from 'Points' on)
| Rank | Player Name | Team | Points
Successful attack points scored
|
Errors
Attacks that resulted in an error
|
Attempts
Attacks that resulted in neither a point nor an error
|
Average per match
Average attack points scored per match
|
Success %
Percentage of total attacks that scored a point
|
Total
All attacks, including points, errors and other attempts
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Romanò | ITA | 88 | 16 | 50 | 14.67 | 57.14 | 154 |
| 2 | Leon | POL | 81 | 28 | 74 | 13.50 | 44.26 | 183 |
| 3 | Anderson | USA | 80 | 20 | 58 | 13.33 | 50.63 | 158 |
| 4 | Russell | USA | 78 | 13 | 53 | 13.00 | 54.17 | 144 |
| 5 | Ngapeth | FRA | 75 | 35 | 61 | 12.50 | 43.86 | 171 |
| 5 | T. Štern | SLO | 75 | 26 | 50 | 18.75 | 49.67 | 151 |
| 6 | Michieletto | ITA | 74 | 13 | 82 | 12.33 | 43.79 | 169 |
| 7 | Patry | FRA | 73 | 19 | 69 | 12.17 | 45.34 | 161 |
| 8 | Clevenot | FRA | 68 | 15 | 38 | 13.60 | 56.20 | 121 |
| 9 | Defalco | USA | 67 | 22 | 53 | 11.17 | 47.18 | 142 |
| 10 | Ishikawa | JPN | 66 | 26 | 53 | 16.50 | 45.52 | 145 |
| 10 | Nishida | JPN | 66 | 21 | 43 | 16.50 | 50.77 | 130 |
| 11 | Kurek | POL | 59 | 30 | 64 | 9.83 | 38.56 | 153 |
| 12 | Lavia | ITA | 57 | 22 | 71 | 9.50 | 38.00 | 150 |
| 12 | Darlan | BRA | 57 | 23 | 29 | 14.25 | 52.29 | 109 |
| 13 | Grozer | GER | 55 | 19 | 40 | 13.75 | 48.25 | 114 |
| 14 | Lucarelli | BRA | 51 | 13 | 43 | 12.75 | 47.66 | 107 |
| 15 | Čebulj | SLO | 50 | 15 | 53 | 12.50 | 42.37 | 118 |
| 16 | Karlitzek | GER | 48 | 11 | 46 | 12.00 | 45.71 | 105 |
| 17 | Ran | JPN | 45 | 19 | 39 | 11.25 | 43.69 | 103 |
Romano demonstrates the strongest scoring efficiency among the top three attackers. He scored the most points at 88 while making only 16 errors and achieving a 57.14% success rate. Leon scored 81 points with 28 errors and a 44.26% success rate, while Anderson scored 80 points with 20 errors and a 50.63% success rate. This shows that Romano's top ranking was supported by both high scoring and efficient attacking.
| Player | Points | Errors | Success % |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yuri Romanò | 88 | 16 | 57.14% |
| Wilfredo Leon | 81 | 28 | 44.26% |
| Matthew Anderson | 80 | 20 | 50.63% |
More attacking opportunities do not necessarily result in more points. Leon had the most total attacks of the three at 183, but Romano scored 7 more points despite having only 154 total attacks. Anderson also scored just one fewer point than Leon with 25 fewer total attacks. Comparing points with total attacks provides more context for how effectively players used their opportunities.
| Player | Points | Attempts | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yuri Romanò | 88 | 50 | 154 |
| Wilfredo Leon | 81 | 74 | 183 |
| Matthew Anderson | 80 | 58 | 158 |
The data demonstrates that attacking performance cannot be understood through one statistic alone. Total attacks show how frequently a player was involved offensively, while points and success percentage help reveal the results and efficiency of those opportunities. Comparing these measures together provides a more complete picture of why attackers with seemingly similar statistics can have very different overall rankings.